Q: My neighbors parents are in town and he said he wanted to, but did not wait for it to dl its dial-up . So I offered to get it and burn it to Microsoft him.
I found. NET Framework SDK v1.1 from Microsoft? s site. I suppose this is the full version as a service pack. Am I correct? Also, whats SDK anyway? Ive seen many times what Microsoft before.
Lastly. NET Framework?
Best Answer: I had the same problem after this last Windows update. It has something to do with the anti-virus preventing this program from turning itself off.
Here's what worked for me: I turned off my anti-virus (I'm using Norton) restarted my computer and then turned on the anti-virus.
Hope that helps.
Lisa,
I'm no techno-geek so proceed at your own risk! I'm using Norton 360 so I don't know if this will work for all editions. I opened Norton and clicked on "settings". On the right side is a column of "Quick Controls". I unchecked all the boxes. Make sure you remember which ones are checked and which ones are not checked. It gave me all kinds of warnings about turning off the security but I just clicked "OK". When they were all unchecked, I clicked "close" (on the bottom right) and I restarted my laptop. Once it was running again, I opened Norton, clicked on "settings" and rechecked the boxes that I had unchecked earlier. Then I closed Norton and everything was back to normal.
Good luck!
Use Microsoft Office 2007 like a Pro!
Re:Originally posted by: guy
What really sucks is anyone who runs your program will then have to download the .NET framework just to get it to run! It's like 26 MB! That will make most people steer clear of any software you develop in .NET. I'd call that a pretty big negative of developing in .NET over VS 6.0.
Don't see that as a big problem in the future; and even today. Java's Runtime is around 6MB and even d/lding patches for Windows is bigger than that. With broadband around that's even less of a problem. Like what guy said, future Windows version will have the .NET framework included once the applications reach critical… IMO 
And updating the .NET framework will just be like updating IE.
3 Net Lease Profits Course
Re:Originally posted by: guy
What really sucks is anyone who runs your program will then have to download the .NET framework just to get it to run! It's like 26 MB! That will make most people steer clear of any software you develop in .NET. I'd call that a pretty big negative of developing in .NET over VS 6.0.
That really isn't such a big deal. The VB6 runtime files package is also pretty big. It's actually about 23 MB, which is nothing over a high speed connection. Dialup users can get a cd or something. The advantages of developing in .net far (far far far far) outweight this little inconvenience.
.Net is really a great technology. Eventually the framework will be included in windows by default. You only need to be concerned if this is a standard windows forms app, web apps of course don't require the user to have anything.
Excel Expert User-Your One Stop Solution In Mastering Microsoft Excel
Re:What really sucks is anyone who runs your program will then have to download the .NET framework just to get it to run! It's like 26 MB! That will make most people steer clear of any software you develop in .NET. I'd call that a pretty big negative of developing in .NET over VS 6.0.
Lung Detoxification – Clean Your Lungs and Quit Smoking
Re:.NET framework == Contains libraries required to run applications written for .NET. Similar to Java's Java Runtime Environment.
.NET SDK == Contains libraries as well as compilers and stuff to allow you to both run and code applications for the .NET environment. Similar to Java's SDK.
Men After Divorce – Divorce Recovery for Guys
Re:Originally posted by: guy
Originally posted by: guyYou would use the .net framework 1.1 (not sdk) to run applications that were developed using the .net framework. Can't run those apps at all without it.
So NET Framework v1.1 is something different than NET Framework v1.1 SDK??
That's what I'm gathering from your comment.
yes. U can run .NET programs with both, but the SDK version also allows you to create .NET programs.
Learn How To Use Microsoft Excel Quickly and Easily
Re:Originally posted by: guyYou would use the .net framework 1.1 (not sdk) to run applications that were developed using the .net framework. Can't run those apps at all without it.
So NET Framework v1.1 is something different than NET Framework v1.1 SDK??
That's what I'm gathering from your comment.
Master Your Workload with Microsoft Outlook
Re:You would use the .net framework sdk to develop windows applications using vb.net, c#, c++.net, or j#. The sdk includes all the files you'll need to write and compile these applications. You can also use visual studio.net, which of course, isn't free….but it is really nice.
You would use the .net framework 1.1 (not sdk) to run applications that were developed using the .net framework. Can't run those apps at all without it.
The Neutral Net Trading System!
Re:Yes the 1.1 SDK is a full version. SDK = Software Development Kit
thx
Josh
0 Comments.