Q: I recently RMAd my GF4 Ti4200 AGP 8x, and will probably get a FX5600 (non-ultra) as a replacement because it seems that the supplier has exhausted GF4 Ti4200s . Is this a fair replacement?
Thanks!
Re:No it's not a fair replacement…Hmm I had to rma my ti4200 also..I hope they don't sent me back some pos fx5600.
Re:Having owned both a fx5600 and a Ti4200 which do you think I kept? The Ti4200 ofcourse because in almost every benchmark I ran it outperformed the fx5600 so unless you love 3dmark03 give the fx5600 a miss.
Re:Originally posted by: guy
I recently RMA'd my GF4 Ti4200 8x AGP, and will probably get an FX5600 (non-ultra) as replacement since it seems the supplier has run out of GF4 Ti4200's…Is this a fair replacement?
Thanks!
no
Re:Arghhh..the usually base replacement on a price basis, and here the Ti4200 costs the same as an FX5600 now…
Re:Originally posted by: guy
I recently RMA'd my GF4 Ti4200 8x AGP, and will probably get an FX5600 (non-ultra) as replacement since it seems the supplier has run out of GF4 Ti4200's…Is this a fair replacement?
Thanks!
No, it's definately not fair. Especially a 5600 non-ultra. Check here (http://www.{$MySite}/video/showdoc.html?i=1797&p=6) for the Ti4200 and the 5600 ULTRA running neck-and-neck (it's all throughout the review). And the Ti4200 is the better overclocker of the two, by a long shot.
So, no a FX5600 isn't a fair deal. A FX5600 Ultra might be considering it is better with AA/AF on, but it's close.
0 Comments.