Full Video Converter: Convert And Edit Any Video
Re:Originally posted by: guy
Originally posted by: guy
What's the point of an uber-fast monitor? I play on a monitor with a 16ms response time and everything looks fine. No ghosting or anything..
e-penis.
8ms is fine. if you really think you need a 4,3,2 or even 1ms response time monitor, in my opinion, you are an ass. (that you is not directed at a particular person, as in, if one was to think one needed a 1ms response time monitor, I would consider one an ass)
when they say 1ms, they don't mean a true 1ms, like that article said, it's BS. There's no industry standard for 'response time' so they can just use whatever measurement they want to make it look good.
Exactly! Everyone measures it differently, so the numbers mean NOTHING!
Autoresponder – Auto Email Response – Autoresponder Ilimitado
Re:Originally posted by: guy
What's the point of an uber-fast monitor? I play on a monitor with a 16ms response time and everything looks fine. No ghosting or anything..
e-penis.
8ms is fine. if you really think you need a 4,3,2 or even 1ms response time monitor, in my opinion, you are an ass. (that you is not directed at a particular person, as in, if one was to think one needed a 1ms response time monitor, I would consider one an ass)
when they say 1ms, they don't mean a true 1ms, like that article said, it's BS. There's no industry standard for 'response time' so they can just use whatever measurement they want to make it look good.
Animated Video Backgrounds – Standard & High Definition
Re:What's the point of an uber-fast monitor? I play on a monitor with a 16ms response time and everything looks fine. No ghosting or anything..
Workout Without Working Out — Subliminal Health & Fitness Videos
Re:Originally posted by: guy
Originally posted by: wizboy11
Is it an 8-bit monitor?
Nope. Read Bozo's link.
Good, then I still have the worlds fastest 8-bit monitor (i think).
Antivirus Software! – Emergency Response
Re:Originally posted by: wizboy11
Is it an 8-bit monitor?
Nope. Read Bozo's link.
HTML Video Tutorial For Beginners
Re:Is it an 8-bit monitor?
EZ-Response Follow Up Sequential Auto Re
Re:Originally posted by: guy
As expected it's just more BS using a BS metric.
:thumbsup:
Whatever's 8ms or better on a-si TFT/PVA panels by samsung is good enough for me.
Photoshop Video Tutorials
Re:As expected it's just more BS using a BS metric.
Classic Energy Videos – Free Energy Videos you haven’t seen!
Re:yeah, this article on AT's home page "Daily Tech" says its all BS>
(Quoite)
Viewsonic's current displays advertise 2 and 4 millisecond response times on gray to gray (GTG) scales over 256 data points. What the company does not disclose is the actual gray to gray states — meaning the GTG response time may only represent the twisting of the liquid crystals from the 1st to the 2nd subpixel state, or the 2nd to the 3rd, etc. In essence, Viewsonic's 1ms response time is the measure of the liquid crystal twisting from #FF to #FE.
Viewsonic, like most display companies, does not manufacturer its own LCD panels. Viewsonic's current LCD provider for high response time LCDs, AU Optoelectronics, only manufacturers panels with 12ms and 16ms advertised response times. How Viewsonic manages to bypass the laws of physics to twist liquid crystals faster than the manufacturer by adding a digital signal processor remains to be seen.
(Unquote)
http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=700
Video Marketing Pioneers (50 Interviews
Re:Originally posted by: guy
Faster is almost always better. I have been looking at LCD TVs lately and some, even ones that claim 12MS, are laggy, while one I looked at claims 16MS was fine. My main test is to load up a DVD with some huge explosions on it, and if it is the slightest bit laggy, I move on.
Never belive the Manufacturers ratings, they are often inflated. One makers 16MS display might be a true 25-30ms panel while anothers 16MS could be a 20-21ms panel.
Re:Faster is almost always better. I have been looking at LCD TVs lately and some, even ones that claim 12MS, are laggy, while one I looked at claims 16MS was fine. My main test is to load up a DVD with some huge explosions on it, and if it is the slightest bit laggy, I move on.
Re:Originally posted by: guy
Originally posted by: guy
Cool. I guess. 2ms work good enough for me.
The viewsonic display is twice as quick as that.
LOL. True. But then again, it's kinda like getting 240 fps in Forsaken, compared to *just* 120 fps. 
Re:Originally posted by: guy
Cool. I guess. 2ms work good enough for me.
The viewsonic display is twice as quick as that.
Re:Cool. I guess. 2ms work good enough for me.
0 Comments.